|
Post by UDog™ on Jun 10, 2008 21:36:32 GMT -5
Anyone plan on seeing it?
What do you guys think it will do. to the other Marvel movies ?
|
|
|
Post by cfs on Jun 14, 2008 0:07:08 GMT -5
Saw the movie. Liked it better than Iron Man. Noticed that they had the super soldier serum in the movie. "Dr, Reinstein" was the name on the bottle they took out of deep freeze. Also saw they were setting up the Leader as a villain.
cfs
|
|
|
Post by G on Jun 14, 2008 10:53:33 GMT -5
I have been wanting to see both Iron Man and The Hulk, but chances are, I wont go because I dont go to the movies. The last time I went was 4 yrs ago. I just dont like the theater experience. Well, the theater isnt the problem, its the theater goers that make me wish I didnt go. In the end, I'll probably see it 3-4 years from now when either someone hands me a disc with it on it, or I happen to see it on tv after its long forgotten by the rest of the general population.
|
|
|
Post by UDog™ on Jun 14, 2008 11:17:55 GMT -5
This is an awesome awesome awesome movie.
First it starts off with some flashbacks (so you'll know what the story is about) like i didn't lol .
Ok so scientist Bruce Banner is hiding out in a favela in Brazil . So the movie takes off from there, i'm not going to say any more because its better to see it.
Anyways the nice thing about it was they showed an clip of Bill Bixby (who as passed on now) and Stan Lee (well you should know who he is) and the hulk himself Lou Ferrigno .
For me Edward Norton (2008 Banner/Hulk) played Bruce Banner very good , this movie by far is better than their first try at making this movie which i don't remember much of (but the bad parts lol) .
I give this movie a 100% a must see. Oh when the movie ends don't leave there's something that's is leading to what i take will be the biggest Marvel Comics movie to come yet.
|
|
|
Post by bigw1966 on Jan 29, 2010 11:20:28 GMT -5
This was fantastic. Better than the Ang Lee version by a long shot. A sequal would be pointless unless the Hulk evolved in some way that changed the dynamic. This was the Fugitive with monsters.
|
|
Wrecks
Standout Worker
Posts: 145
I Am Offline!
|
Post by Wrecks on Jan 29, 2010 20:23:46 GMT -5
Oh yeah... This version was a lot better then the last one.
|
|
|
Post by defiant1 on Jan 29, 2010 21:43:46 GMT -5
The first one had some great classic scenes of Hulk jumping around in the desert and destroying military equipment, but the plot was horrible. The second one was MUCH better. I'm looking forward to Hulk in the Avengers movie. Hulk is easily my favorite Marvel character.
Defiant1
|
|
|
Post by G on Oct 26, 2011 21:22:11 GMT -5
I think I've mentioned it lately but a couple of weeks ago I got Direct TV and I must say I like it better than Dish Network. The quality of the channels I'm getting is far surpassing what I had with Dish. Anyway, I was channel surfing tonight and going through the Premium movie channels and I happened upon the Hulk. The 2003 Ang Lee version. I know, I know, I'm 8 years late on this. Well shoot me, I never seen it, until now.... I had missed the 1st 15 - 30 minutes of it but what I saw was pretty cool. The Hulk sequences and the story between him and Ross was pretty good. Where it got muddied up for me is when the Absorbing Man got involved and how he was Banner's dad and what happened with his mom and when the Gamma Radiant Bomb was dropped. Since I missed the beginning, none of that made much sense to me. The Hulk itself and being captured and escaping from Ross's fortress and subsequent chase down scenes while free in the outside world were kick ass. I thought the CGI animation would bother me, but once you get used to it, I hardly noticed. I thought it was a pretty kick ass flick. I hated the way it ended and I just didn't understand the Absorbing Man sequences. I thought those aspects were really weak. The Absorbing Man could have been pretty fucking cool but instead he was mainly unidentifiable during most of the fight scenes. Would have been so much better if we could have seen him in fool person mode with his absorbing powers going toe to toe. Instead we just seen him absorbing properties and becomes masses of those objects. Regardless of it's shortcomings, I rather enjoyed it any way and when it was all over I was ready to see the newer movie. One thing I like about this one is the Hulk was old school smash it up dumb Hulk. I loved that. I think if it was smart Hulk I wouldn't have hardly liked it at all. Instead it was like my childhood memories come to life.
|
|
|
Post by bigw1966 on Oct 27, 2011 9:06:52 GMT -5
Now you need to check out the new one. I think its on netflix instant.
|
|
|
Post by G on Oct 27, 2011 19:28:28 GMT -5
Now you need to check out the new one. I think its on netflix instant. I would like to see the new one. I'm actually surprised how much I enjoyed the older one. I won't say it was perfect because it in no means was. I really didn't like the Absorbing Man being Bruce's father and all those scenes relating to him and I hate that I feel that way because I really fucking dig the Absorbing Man ever since I 1st saw him back in the 70's. I always thought he was kick ass. But to me, his part of the movie was the weakest link. The Hulk solo scenes and story is where the original movie ruled. So, yes I would be hyped to see the newer one. Unfortunately I no longer have Netflix. I loved Netflix but I got my use out of them and had begun not using them enough to make them worth the money. I'm much happier with Direct TV. I'll keep my eyes open for the newer Hulk on there.
|
|