|
Post by cyberstrike on Jun 9, 2011 18:23:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by G on Jun 9, 2011 21:45:42 GMT -5
Frankly I think half the list could be gone and they would end up even better. I think they still have too much coming out. I have conflicting feelings about this.
On the one hand, I don't think its a bad idea to revamp EVERYTHING at once. I almost like it better than revamping PARTS of a universe and leaving other parts NEEDING improvement untouched.
However, a BIG part of me has MAJOR problems with this.
First of all, how do you reward titles like Action, Detective, Batman and Superman? By suddenly starting them over at #1? Are you fucking serious???
Action is like 8 years away from Action comics #1000! I think that is incredible! I think that is such an accomplishment, it should be celebrated! Instead, it's going to be relaunched with a #1? Does anybody feel this is as significant as the REAL Action Comics #1???
Second, this is my other gripes. There are still too many Batman titles. Still too many Green Lantern titles. And even worse, still too many titles that just don't need to be there period! There could be some real strength by going back to bare bones.
It's not different if it isn't different. Its a rehash of the same shit by the same weak ideas and minds that have soaked this kind of thing dry for the last 15 years.
I see some value in some of it and this may eventually even be a turning point if done properly. But in reality, its going to accomplish very little to slash all your titles and renumber them ALL #1 and claim everything is going to be different and then come out and do the same old shit. The idea isn't flawed as much as how they pull it off might very will be.
|
|
|
Post by bigw1966 on Jun 10, 2011 14:41:00 GMT -5
ITs an interesting list to be sure. They have announced a few more titles today like Stormwatch. I like how the Wildstorm characters are being intigrated into DC.
I think the reason they are doing this many, is because of the signifigance of the number 52, they will show some nice profit gains until they know which books will get dropped, and they are covering a number of genre bases which will allow them wider appeal.
We will see what happens.
|
|
|
Post by defiant1 on Jun 10, 2011 14:41:23 GMT -5
I think they just want to get headlines for topping marvel in sales that month. Also, if this rolls out in Sept., I believe that is when sales typically drop due to the holidays and school schedules.
This may be a preventative measure to maintain sales levels at a time that would otherwise be difficult on their budget.
df1
|
|
AC
Standout Worker
Posts: 105
I Am Offline!
Likes: 1
|
Post by AC on Jul 2, 2011 13:36:30 GMT -5
Been away awhile, gotten busy with school and work. I posted my thoughts on this at the ole' blog (thoughts on each title, and the reboot at large).
At first I really hated the thought of reverting the numbering back to #1. I can *kind of* understand the logic of it with the day and date digital experiment. It'll be easier to goad the ever elusive "new reader (who's dying to get into comics, if only the issue number wasn't so... intimidating)" into an impulse buy of a digital Action Comics #1 than a digital Action Comics #906 (or whichever it would've been).
That logic, however also kinda bugs me as a long time reader... I'm only 31, so I wasn't around for anything near a "real" #1... and I got along just fine. Started collecting the main Marvel titles in the mid to late 80's... so they were numbered in the high 200's/early 300's. I wasn't intimidated, or dissuaded from following certain titles. Got into DC much later... while Action and Detective were in the 600/700's I believe. Books were written a bit differently then, I guess, and weren't so co-dependent on sister/brother titles and their varying continuities.
I do think DC is a tad bit optimistic on the success of some of these titles... a Voodoo ongoing? In 2011? I guess we'll see.
|
|
|
Post by defiant1 on Jul 2, 2011 17:17:40 GMT -5
Been away awhile, gotten busy with school and work. I posted my thoughts on this at the ole' blog (thoughts on each title, and the reboot at large). At first I really hated the thought of reverting the numbering back to #1. I can *kind of* understand the logic of it with the day and date digital experiment. It'll be easier to goad the ever elusive "new reader (who's dying to get into comics, if only the issue number wasn't so... intimidating)" into an impulse buy of a digital Action Comics #1 than a digital Action Comics #906 (or whichever it would've been). That logic, however also kinda bugs me as a long time reader... I'm only 31, so I wasn't around for anything near a "real" #1... and I got along just fine. Started collecting the main Marvel titles in the mid to late 80's... so they were numbered in the high 200's/early 300's. I wasn't intimidated, or dissuaded from following certain titles. Got into DC much later... while Action and Detective were in the 600/700's I believe. Books were written a bit differently then, I guess, and weren't so co-dependent on sister/brother titles and their varying continuities. I do think DC is a tad bit optimistic on the success of some of these titles... a Voodoo ongoing? In 2011? I guess we'll see. You summed up why they are doing it. If they release them digitally with a high number, people will be asking where the back issues are. They'd have been smarter to keep the numbering on the print comics and put a block inside saying that it is a reprint of their digital release of Action #__ I suspect this will kill the print sales and be a flop on all fronts after the first few months. df1
|
|
|
Post by G on Jul 3, 2011 8:47:46 GMT -5
I've always looked at the issue # as part of the collecting side of it. I never felt intimidated by jumping onto comics at large issue numbers just as long as where the title was currently at was making sense and entertaining me. Chances are, if I was liking the title, no matter how large the collection was, back in the day, I would start seeking out previous back issues.
With me I was entering comics when lots of GOOD comics were high in number. Fantastic Four was around 190. Avengers was around 170. Iron Man was around 110. X-Men was around 110. Daredevil was around 150. Hulk was around 200. Captain America was around 220. Batman was around 300. Detective was around 400. Superman was around 300. Action was around 400. This of course was over 30 years ago. And even today, those were some large numbers. The thing about it was was how much of a challenge did I want? There was like today certainly a lot of smaller titles out there with small issue runs at the time. Books like Machine Man, Nova, SpiderWoman, Ms. Marvel, Rom, New Teen Titans, She Hulk, etc, etc. There was always plenty of titles with short doable histories too. You could decide to go after one of these smaller ones and have them completed pretty easily. The bigger runs with the long histories were like pride collections. For instance I took a big liking to X-Men and the Fantastic Four so I started going after the back issues. I remember I had a friend who went after Iron Mans. We would go to the comic shops and I remember buying old back issues and watching our collections grow. I don't think we ever really entertained the idea that we'd ever have them all because we knew the early issues were too expensive for us. However, we kept going back and buying old back issues and before you knew it, we had amassed a lot of the Silver Age and had most of the modern comics. Now when it came time to show off your collection, these were the collections you were most proud of. I remember when X-Men got up to around issue 150, I had about 120 of them. The remaining 30 were issues I couldn't afford or couldn't find. But the collection I had, I was extremely proud of. I think my friend actually ended up with an Iron Man #1 and by time Iron Man hit #140, he had around 120 Iron Mans. The collector in us was totally turned on.
I remember meeting another would be friend in comics at the time who was a real geek. He had more comics than all of us combined at the time. His room was in an attic so it basically took up most of the top floor. In his room he had thousands of comics. He probably had 10,000 comics at the age of 15. I had about 1,000 at the time. I remember he had a run of Action Comics that spanned from about 100 - 400. He was 15 years old and he had about the last 300 issues of Action. Did he think he was ever going to have them all? I doubt it. I don't think he entertained the idea that he was going to have an Action Comics #1 too much. But I'm sure in his dream of dreams he was seeing himself with all of them. The fact remained he had about the last 300 consecutive and it was impressive especially being at this young age. The collector in him was turned on. He wanted them all.
Now with this relaunch you are basically wiping that side of it out. You're basically telling people that they don't need to think that way. You're telling them its too intimidating for them and don't worry about it. We'll start over. Here you go. Here's a bunch of comics with low issue counts that you can get start to finish. Don't worry about history. All you need to know about is now.
Funny, when I go into comic shop these days I'm usually one of the only people looking at comics. At least back issues. Instead what I see happening is lots of kids sitting around the Yu-gi-oh tables playing geek games or older readers buying trade paperbacks. The modern "reader" (not collector mind you) is keeping up to date buying trade paperbacks. The kids don't even care about the comics. The older veterans of comics like me have all quit. The back issues sit with dust on top of them. No one wants them. Every store has a ton of back issues but no one is wading through them. The trade paperback is making it to where this is all the back issue you need. The collector is outdated and dying. He is not being fed anything exciting anymore. He's not interested in collecting a single storyline. Hes no longer being rewarded for seeking out the history of the comic. Instead, he is being pushed under the rug.
I often wonder about someone like my old friend who had Action 100 - 400 complete all those years ago. When every new issue came out, he had it on top of his massive collection. It became the newest piece of his prized collection. What if he kept collecting to this very day? He would have had easily Action 100 - 900 by now and probably a lot of issues below 100. Easily this would have been a major source of pride. Anybody with any collecting sense at all would have been in awe of this collection. I think what if he was collecting today and seen DC just announce they were going to relaunch their entire comics line. Do you think he's going to love having Action Comics #100 - 900 and then suddenly when the newest one comes out he had to put Action Comics #1 volume 2 on the top? I think not. I think it will be a sad day for someone like that. And maybe the final straw. He's been pushed aside.
I remember reading when Archie got married a collector who had every issue of Archie comics decided to quit. Archie had chose Veronica 1st and I think he was a bit partial to Betty. When it was announce he would marry both he felt he had seen enough. This was someone who had EVERY issue! Thats a lot of Archies! He finally felt like he had been pushed aside. Hes seen enough.
I think for long term collectors and hobbyist the relaunch is basically a slap in the face. A pushing aside. The short term trade paperback readers (not collectors mind you) benefit from having a point one spot to jump on at. A new launching spot from 2011 is being developed. Collectors be damned. Sure, there isn't many of us left. But I think the hobby was a lot healthier when it was full of both readers AND collectors. And very often collectors were your most ardent READERS. All that is left now is fickle readers. Readers who would drop a run without a second thought because they don't have any history invested in it. Or because the currently storyline is over and the new one doesn't interest them like the last one did. To me this all speaks volumes of the health of the industry. Comic Shops are almost outdated now. Replaced with Trade Paperbacks that can be picked up at any Barnes and Nobles and current issues can be seen digitally on their computer. There isn't a need to visit the comic shop anymore. The back issues sit. The new issues have ways of being seen without visiting the shop. The health of the medium has already been compromised. The white flag for comic shops and comic collectors has been raised. We're outdated and no longer needed.
The reader wins. But at the cost of the comic collecting. I think this backfires. Not having comic collectors means less interest and dwindling sales.
You reap what you sow. I think DC just parted itself from over 70s years of history. Think of all the COLLECTORS it had along the way?! Maybe some of them were still there. Maybe some of them had quit and had thought about coming back one day. I think DC just shut the door on them. Severed its ties to collectors who had a rich history in buying and seeing only the fickle READER of today as who to cater too.
After giving this relaunch a long thinking. I think DC has made a terrible mistake. As someone who is a longer term collector AND reader. I personally have just become disenchanted and alienated. I'm no longer interested in DC.
Fuck em.
|
|
AC
Standout Worker
Posts: 105
I Am Offline!
Likes: 1
|
Post by AC on Jul 3, 2011 10:33:34 GMT -5
It is rather lonely at the back issue bins, ain't it? Usually I'm the only one there in shops I frequent too. Kind of a blessing and a curse out here, the back issues at large are clearanced out a few times a year. Good to get some pretty sweet deals, got Morrison's JLA #1 (marked at $30 in store) for 75 cents. Not so good in it's an active attempt by the shops to GET RID of all the back issues... because nobody, aside from folks like us want the damn things.
I definitely have some collector-pains over this... hell, I am an active TPB buyer, but I still do go back to pick up the singles if I like the story, or have that particular title as a collection.
I've recently gone nuts picking up Uncanny X-Men and X-Factor singles, even though I've got all the Essential volumes... even with those Essentials, my collection just didn't "feel" complete without the individual issues. Don't get me started on the Uncanny reboot either...
I can't think of a terribly poignant analogy, but DC is definitely taking us collectors for granted here, figuring we'll stick around regardless... and pandering to the elusive new reader.
|
|
|
Post by defiant1 on Jul 3, 2011 15:57:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by G on Jul 4, 2011 9:29:15 GMT -5
I find it interesting that our timeliness are very similar. Although we often had different reasons for quitting we were sometimes very much the same too. I think the realization that things had deteriorated around the same time although it seems to have hit you earlier and harder, the realization of what's missing and wrong is in agreement. I don't think it is a coincidence and I'm sure a lot more feel the same way.
|
|